ADVERTISEMENT

If we ‘follow the science, like leftists clamor, Roe v Wade would have died of its own weight

30CAT

Heisman Winner
Gold Member
May 29, 2001
51,452
12,149
708
Williamstown, WV
Leftists are okay with killing children, only following science when it supports their radical agenda and destroying our country

LINK: Looking at the Founding Documents, you not locate a reference to abortion or the right to obstetric termination, laying out a timeline of evolution in both technology and law illustrating Roe as a flawed decision and one defying "science."

Roe v Wade reversed almost 200 years of American jurisprudence — there is not a word in the Constitution, not one about abortion. There's not a word in the Federalist Papers about abortion.

The justices ruling in the majority to hand down Roe in 1973 were jurisprudentially misguided or worse.

Justice Harry Blackmun, a Nixon appointee who instead became one of the bench's staunchest liberals, "one of the dumbest members of the court in the last 100 years."

Blackmun helped characterize abortion legally as an issue of privacy. Abortion is not explicitly protected in the Constitution — and thereby reserved as a state's power under the 10th Amendment.

Citing the second-most famous abortion case, 1992's "Casey," in which pro-life Pennsylvania Democratic Gov. Bob Casey Sr. — father of liberal Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Pa. — battled Planned Parenthood over the ability to enforce state restrictions on abortion.

The case was a divided judgment that basically allowed… abortion-on-demand if a state decided that there would be abortion-on-demand, while in turn allowing states to regulate it during the first trimester.

With that prior adjustment of Roe precedent being laid out, fast-forward to present-day, there are many Democrats who support last-minute terminations.

And when you do partial-birth abortion… they take a very, very big syringe. They stick it into… the top of the head of the baby. They drain the brain out. They turn the baby around, now dead, and pull it out by its feet, that platform contradicts Democrats' demands to "follow the science" regarding coronavirus and vaccines.

You see, if we ‘follow that science,' that's a baby. We know the baby feels pain. If we ‘follow the science,' Roe v Wade would have died of its own weight.

This is a party that supports abortion, the most extreme kind of abortion: infanticide right up to the last second.
 
Leftists are okay with killing children, only following science when it supports their radical agenda and destroying our country

LINK: Looking at the Founding Documents, you not locate a reference to abortion or the right to obstetric termination, laying out a timeline of evolution in both technology and law illustrating Roe as a flawed decision and one defying "science."

Roe v Wade reversed almost 200 years of American jurisprudence — there is not a word in the Constitution, not one about abortion. There's not a word in the Federalist Papers about abortion.

The justices ruling in the majority to hand down Roe in 1973 were jurisprudentially misguided or worse.

Justice Harry Blackmun, a Nixon appointee who instead became one of the bench's staunchest liberals, "one of the dumbest members of the court in the last 100 years."

Blackmun helped characterize abortion legally as an issue of privacy. Abortion is not explicitly protected in the Constitution — and thereby reserved as a state's power under the 10th Amendment.

Citing the second-most famous abortion case, 1992's "Casey," in which pro-life Pennsylvania Democratic Gov. Bob Casey Sr. — father of liberal Sen. Bob Casey Jr., D-Pa. — battled Planned Parenthood over the ability to enforce state restrictions on abortion.

The case was a divided judgment that basically allowed… abortion-on-demand if a state decided that there would be abortion-on-demand, while in turn allowing states to regulate it during the first trimester.

With that prior adjustment of Roe precedent being laid out, fast-forward to present-day, there are many Democrats who support last-minute terminations.

And when you do partial-birth abortion… they take a very, very big syringe. They stick it into… the top of the head of the baby. They drain the brain out. They turn the baby around, now dead, and pull it out by its feet, that platform contradicts Democrats' demands to "follow the science" regarding coronavirus and vaccines.

You see, if we ‘follow that science,' that's a baby. We know the baby feels pain. If we ‘follow the science,' Roe v Wade would have died of its own weight.

This is a party that supports abortion, the most extreme kind of abortion: infanticide right up to the last second.
Science needs to answer a very basic question, when does life begin? From that point on abortion becomes murder . For me I believe it's at conception . Science calls a one cell life in most cases except in human life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: atlkvb
Science needs to answer a very basic question, when does life begin? From that point on abortion becomes murder . For me I believe it's at conception . Science calls a one cell life in most cases except in human life.

Exactly...If scientists would happen to discover a single-cell organism on another planet, we will have discovered life in outerspace. Well, if we're not going to count a child that hasn't been born yet, then how would they, scientifically, be able to make that claim?

BTW, I agree with life at conception.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT