"Election Month" is Over in Georgia - A Primer on What to Expect in the Peach StateTopic: Elections
|
Elections in America are so tainted, analysts are relegated to scrutinizing numbers that are byproducts of political narratives, and guesstimating results based on anything but empirical evidence and sound mathematics. In the case of Georgia, today’s possible conclusion (not guaranteed in the event of a multi-day count), otherwise referred to as Election Day, of the U.S. Senate runoff between incumbent Democrat Raphael Warnock and populist former football star Herschel Walker, the Republican, will put a wrap on “Election Month.”
The narratives are set. The mainstream media polling points to a comfortable Warnock win between three and five points, and the media has surrounded that polling with all the proper coverage suggesting early voting has once again “shattered” all-time records. In the age of media-controlled elections, apparently there is no such thing as a low turnout election like we saw in the 2014 midterms, which had the lowest participation of any midterm in the last half-century.
Remember, early voting allows for maximum information and data to be collected ahead of the final day of the election (“Election Day”). Election manipulators know who from both sides remains to vote, and that voter’s likelihood of turning out based on sophisticated data collection and rating scales. They spit out terms like “4/4” voter, which would reflect a voter who has voted in each of the past four federal elections. If that voter alsovotes exclusively for one party in primaries (like in Georgia, which doesn’t register voters by party), then someone intent on manipulating an election result can bank that person’s vote for a particular candidate with high likelihood of being correct. With the use of sophisticated tabulation equipment, I would not be surprised if certain states are sneaking a look at the tallies ahead of Election Day. In fact, I would expect it.
Politics in the south is very simple. In some metro areas, such as Charlotte or Atlanta, population growth and demographic change can alter some voting patterns, but in most of the former Democrat solid south, politics is black and white, literally. The white vote in the Deep South exceeds two to one Republican, and in the boonies, you’re looking at 85-90%. The white vote is offset by the heavy black vote in the South, which is much more loyal to Democrats than it is in other regions, like the Rust Belt (Trump pulled nearly 30% of the black male vote in the Industrial Midwest in 2020, another indicator that those elections are hot trash)...
