ADVERTISEMENT

How Coaches Rank and Ours is Rank(LOL)

2 losing season in his first 2 years and Strong is ahead of Dana. Something is fishy.
 
Strong got two years in the BE to inflate that record. Dana got one. With the weapons Holgs had on offense, if WVU had remained in the BE for that final season WVU would have ran the table against that bunch of stiffs. Likely 12-1 with a bowl. Makes 'em about the same doesn't it?

As for Ricardo, I can't trust a Mexican who won't wear a sombrero.
 
Strong got two years in the BE to inflate that record. Dana got one. With the weapons Holgs had on offense, if WVU had remained in the BE for that final season WVU would have ran the table against that bunch of stiffs. Likely 12-1 with a bowl. Makes 'em about the same doesn't it?
How was Holgorsen going to "run the table" in another hypothetical year in the BE with the "weapons" he had when he couldn't do it against either Strong or 5-7 Syracuse in the real year of 2011 when WVU was 10-3 and Louisville just 7-6?

WVU has never won more than 11 games in a season and now you're giving Dana pretend credit for a fantasy 12-1 year he never had? I never figured you for a fake resume guy, Mike.

P.S. Strong and Holgorsen's first two years in the Big 12 are the same overall (11-14), but favor Strong (9-9 to 6-12) in conference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ColoradoMountaineer
How was Holgorsen going to "run the table" in another hypothetical year in the BE with the "weapons" he had when he couldn't do it against either Strong or 5-7 Syracuse in the real year of 2011 when WVU was 10-3 and Louisville just 7-6?

WVU has never won more than 11 games in a season and now you're giving Dana pretend credit for a fantasy 12-1 year he never had? I never figured you for a fake resume guy, Mike.

P.S. Strong and Holgorsen's first two years in the Big 12 are the same overall (11-14), but favor Strong (9-9 to 6-12) in conference.
So he says Dana would have ran the table (speculation) and you say no way Dana would (speculation) but somehow you're right and he's wrong??.. Hmmmm
 
Yeah, your reasoning. Holgorsen only has to go 12-2 this year to match Strong's current overall head coaching record. Good luck.

Strong who now coaches at what is suppose to be the team in the Big 12 every season and can't get it done. Texas will not wait 6 years. 11- 14 in 2 years will not get it done. Games he won at UL do not make his 11-14 at Texas look good. A 6-6 or worse and he is gone, just like Holgs if he goes 6-6.
 
How was Holgorsen going to "run the table" in another hypothetical year in the BE with the "weapons" he had when he couldn't do it against either Strong or 5-7 Syracuse in the real year of 2011 when WVU was 10-3 and Louisville just 7-6?

WVU has never won more than 11 games in a season and now you're giving Dana pretend credit for a fantasy 12-1 year he never had? I never figured you for a fake resume guy, Mike.

P.S. Strong and Holgorsen's first two years in the Big 12 are the same overall (11-14), but favor Strong (9-9 to 6-12) in conference.

You have to remember that Dana's bodyguards have clung to the we can't do better than 7-5 because were in the Big 12 now theory for years. They have also stated that stewarts 9-3 records where in the big east and that 7-5 in the Big 12 is equivalent to 9-3 in the big east. So by there own logic Dana wouldn't be doing better than 9-3 in the big east. If 9-3 was unacceptable for Stewart than in fairness it should be unacceptable for any coach.Of course we could go on with hypothetical's all day long but what we do know is are 2012 Big 12 record was the same as 2015 and the QB's we recruited out of HS in the Big East where far superior to those recruited out of HS since becoming members of the Big 12.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoWVU
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT