Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently just looking at somebody is tooOriginally posted by MichiganHerd:
Taunting is against the rules, and the penalty is a technical foul.
Why are you so bothered by words on a message board? I gave my opinion as to why the player got teed up.Originally posted by still5-0vstarheels:
Dude once again why are you here? Go troll some where else.
Not trolling. We've been over this before. I'm not your brother. We're not related.Originally posted by still5-0vstarheels:
You do not bother me little brother. But why troll? Is you life so empty that you have to troll a WVU message board to validate yourself.
You don't? Really? You're going to say that?Originally posted by MichiganHerd:
I don't spend my time arguing back & forth by calling other posters retarded
No, not on a non-smack forum. I don't even think I would call you that on a smack forum.Originally posted by WhiteTailEER:
You don't? Really? You're going to say that?Originally posted by MichiganHerd:
I don't spend my time arguing back & forth by calling other posters retarded
Liar
Originally posted by MichiganHerd:
Taunting is against the rules, and the penalty is a technical foul.
Delivering the dreaded double bird sign towards an opponent is also against the rules, and the penalty is a technical foul as well.
If you object to the rules, feel free to write a letter to the NCAA and file a formal complaint.
Agreed. There is nothing good about his postings. He comes over here, drops a smart ass comment and thats "good conversation." I'll never understand herd logic but then again, I've never been called a meth-head.Originally posted by still5-0vstarheels:
Good conversation does not include the numerous troll postings of yours. Not sure you have the knowledge base to hold a good conversation. Including a bad call on taunting. Hey what is Marshall's record this year? Just saying.
Meth head? Perhaps you haven't been called that before, but no doubt, you're a dick head.Originally posted by SeronimusPratt:
Agreed. There is nothing good about his postings. He comes over here, drops a smart ass comment and thats "good conversation." I'll never understand herd logic but then again, I've never been called a meth-head.
Didn't take long for your true character to showOriginally posted by MichiganHerd:
Meth head? Perhaps you haven't been called that before, but no doubt, you're a dick head.Originally posted by SeronimusPratt:
Agreed. There is nothing good about his postings. He comes over here, drops a smart ass comment and thats "good conversation." I'll never understand herd logic but then again, I've never been called a meth-head.
I came here to chime in on sports, but was verbally attacked, so yes, I responded.Originally posted by WhiteTailEER:
Didn't take long for your true character to show
From what I've seen of your posts and your incessant personal attacks, I don't think I want to know what those things might be.Originally posted by MichiganHerd:
You could learn a lot from me
"Many infractions can result in the calling of a technical foul. One of the most common is the use of profane language toward an official or another player"Originally posted by HurdyGurdyEer:
Well anyway ... while I didn't see anything in the replay that warranted a "T" I also did not see Watkins act incredulous or object to to the call.
Something happened. And he is the player who got away with the double bird in another game. You can be sure that the officials know that and keep their ears/eyes open. Borderline behavior gets flagged when it's known that you got away with previous outrageous behavior.
I'm honestly surprised you used you're in the correct use. Bravo. Tell me again how you offer good conversation....Originally posted by MichiganHerd:
Meth head? Perhaps you haven't been called that before, but no doubt, you're a dick head.Originally posted by SeronimusPratt:
Agreed. There is nothing good about his postings. He comes over here, drops a smart ass comment and thats "good conversation." I'll never understand herd logic but then again, I've never been called a meth-head.
Dulane-O, you sound like one of those dumbass politicians who attempts to do the thinking for the weak minded and the not too smart folks by justifying their own violations of the law or of not following the appropriate policy, procedure or protocol by saying, "Well, somebody else did it"...... seems they've learned that works when talking to the dead-from-the-neck-up crowd, but not so well for anyone with a functional brain.Originally posted by Duanep5ku:
I will concede it was a dumb call against WVU,maybe. But I don't really, think that 1 point was the only reason for the loss.
WVU fans I would also like to remind you, that same call was also called against Kansas this year. It happens to be in the rules stupid or not and it's being called at times.
It does seem like the NCAA and the bad Refs are trying to take all the fun out of the game.
The Refs lately have been pretty bad at times for every team in the league,including Kansas.The bad calls do go both ways depending on the team you root for.
You're right. Most people wouldn't even look surprised if they got called for a phantom T.Originally posted by mneilmont:
Since Watkins didn't object to the call, he was therefore guilty? That idiot still had a whistle and it was exceptionally easy for him to blow it the first time. Watkins would have gotten the second if he hadn't walked off, IMO.