I don't think a W or L has much, if any carry-over effect to next season. I also think, the benefit of a few extra practice preparing for a bowl game is grossly overestimated in terms of making the slightest bit of difference the following season.
Teams have to be really bad not to make a bowl nowadays. If teams that miss bowls tend to do poorly the following season no doubt that has a lot more to do with them being weak teams than not having had bowl practices.
If someone has the time and can put together some stats showing that teams that finish 5-7 and barely miss a bowl do worse to a statistically significant degree the following season than teams that finish 6-6 and barely make a bowl, then we could look at whether other factors such as returning players, schedule, etc., are not more responsible for any improvement or lack thereof.
Just because every team that makes a bowl may not be more talented than every team that does not, obviously does not mean that on the whole teams from the same conference that make a bowl are usually better than the teams that don't. There is a reason Kansas is at the bottom and it's not lack of bowl practices. As I said, a team has to be really bad.
An example of one that isn't that terrible and missed a bowl is Texas. Do you think the fact it isn't getting bowl practices will have the slightest impact on how it does next year? Would, Texas improving, beating us and finishing ahead of us in the the standings, be some remarkable outcome since we are getting a handful of practices 8+ months before next season begins?
if you click on the votes you can see who voted and its pretty revealing.
Just because every team that makes a bowl may not be more talented than every team that does not, obviously does not mean that on the whole teams from the same conference that make a bowl are usually better than the teams that don't. There is a reason Kansas is at the bottom and it's not lack of bowl practices. As I said, a team has to be really bad.
An example of one that isn't that terrible and missed a bowl is Texas. Do you think the fact it isn't getting bowl practices will have the slightest impact on how it does next year? Would, Texas improving, beating us and finishing ahead of us in the the standings, be some remarkable outcome since we are getting a handful of practices 8+ months before next season begins?
So far, 100% of 4 voters say Yes. Expectations are running amok!
When did the WVU football team become "Dana"? Does this name change fool you into thinking you're not to trashing the team?
I would certainly hope so. ASU is only 6-6. It is not like we are playing the class of the PAC 12.
I don't think a W or L has much, if any carry-over effect to next season. I also think, the benefit of a few extra practice preparing for a bowl game is grossly overestimated in terms of making the slightest bit of difference the following season.
Teams have to be really bad not to make a bowl nowadays. If teams that miss bowls tend to do poorly the following season no doubt that has a lot more to do with them being weak teams than not having had bowl practices.
If someone has the time and can put together some stats showing that teams that finish 5-7 and barely miss a bowl do worse to a statistically significant degree the following season than teams that finish 6-6 and barely make a bowl, then we could look at whether other factors such as returning players, schedule, etc., are not more responsible for any improvement or lack thereof.
FSU was only 6-6 in 2010 when they spanked us in the Gator Bowl.