ADVERTISEMENT

Bill Stewart I79 exit

great great person..

had a photographic memory, and a hug for performers....

the fan base made a major mistake in pressuring Luck, to remove him and Luck to to gullible to evaluate true coaching talent..

insecurity of the fan base and inexperienced AD, distroyed this great great man
 
great great person..

had a photographic memory, and a hug for performers....

the fan base made a major mistake in pressuring Luck, to remove him and Luck to to gullible to evaluate true coaching talent..

insecurity of the fan base and inexperienced AD, distroyed this great great man

He did seem to be a good guy. He wasn't destroyed. He lost his job, that happens. He has a whole life's work to be proud of, and a family and lots of friends. He was not destroyed.

He seemed like a good dad and husband. He was a head coach of a major University football program and his players admired him. Those are real accomplishments.

If he was a destroyed man, then what are we?
 
Last edited:
great great person..

had a photographic memory, and a hug for performers....

the fan base made a major mistake in pressuring Luck, to remove him and Luck to to gullible to evaluate true coaching talent..

insecurity of the fan base and inexperienced AD, distroyed this great great man
inexperienced AD? Luck, along with Fred schaus, were the 2 best AD's WVU ever had lol. It was the right move to make. Those who disagree don't have a clue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GNEHUNTING
The HCIW was not the right move. Just fire the guy, pay him and move on.
i agree. I just meant it was the right move replacing him. Luck was trying to be professional. He offered him a year to go out in style and ease into a $100k a year athletic dept administrative position. That "Nice guy" (Stewart) tried to ruin an innocent mans (Dana) career instead.
 
i agree. I just meant it was the right move replacing him. Luck was trying to be professional. He offered him a year to go out in style and ease into a $100k a year athletic dept administrative position. That "Nice guy" (Stewart) tried to ruin an innocent mans (Dana) career instead.

There's no such thing as an innocent man.
 
i agree. I just meant it was the right move replacing him. Luck was trying to be professional. He offered him a year to go out in style and ease into a $100k a year athletic dept administrative position. That "Nice guy" (Stewart) tried to ruin an innocent mans (Dana) career instead.
There are still morons who believe that nonesense that Stew tried to hurt Dana. Some people a just gullible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gcb and wvu2007
There are still morons who believe that nonesense that Stew tried to hurt Dana. Some people a just gullible.

Ol' billy was no angel. His mistake was taking the deal Luck put to him. Like it or not, he put himself in that situation.

That was a bad chapter at WVU and no one had clean hands.
 
Ol' billy was no angel. His mistake was taking the deal Luck put to him. Like it or not, he put himself in that situation.

That was a bad chapter at WVU and no one had clean hands.
Bill got paid 1.7 million dollars because he didnt do shit and Luck needed to pay him to sign a non-disclosure. Yeah there are morons who think Bill did what Colin Dunlap said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wvu2007
Bill got paid 1.7 million dollars because he didnt do shit and Luck needed to pay him to sign a non-disclosure. Yeah there are morons who think Bill did what Colin Dunlap said.

I dont think his settlement means much. I'll think for myself. You've never been anything but a puppet for BS and Hank. If you ever have an original thought, it will be your first.

Hanks been elbow deep in you for years, no one takes you seriously.

Bill got paid his money because that's the money WVU owed him. Thinking it was anything more is foolish.
 
LOL - A reporter goes live, on the air, putting his whole career on the line and Dumb Dave's response is HE'S LYING (no evidence).

That's the same horse crap dumb Hank tried selling and now his bootlicker is carrying his water, years later.

Could anything be more predictable?
 
LOL - A reporter goes live, on the air, putting his whole career on the line and Dumb Dave's response is HE'S LYING (no evidence).

That's the same horse crap dumb Hank tried selling and now his bootlicker is carrying his water, years later.

Could anything be more predictable?
Dunlap got fired because it was bullshit. Your obsession with Eersfan is cute but your logic is weak.
 
Fired from where? He left his position before the BS story broke.

Casazza even backed Dunlap.

You can make up whatever bs you need. Ollie admitted the atory was bogus and then paid Bill 1.7 million dollars to speak no more of it.

Casazza was never going to say a bad word about Luck. Did you notice who got the scoop from Oliver? It was no coincidence.
 
There are still morons who believe that nonesense that Stew tried to hurt Dana. Some people a just gullible.

Yeah ... morons like Colin Dunlap believed that "nonsense" after Stew asked him to dig up dirt on Holgs.

Talk about gullible.
 
Dunlap got fired because it was bullshit. Your obsession with Eersfan is cute but your logic is weak.

Dunlap was NOT fired. He remained with the Post-Gazette and became the PG's new beat writer for the Pirates. He became a new father and then decided that he did want to spend all of the time on the road necessary to cover a major league baseball team and then sought other opportunities that allowed him to stay home.

Here's the kicker: I am not absolutely certain ..... but I think Dunlap got the Pirates gig BEFORE the thing with Stew went down. As a matter of fact, I am becoming more certain, it was on Dunlap's radio talk show, or a show that he was filling in on, that he made the revelation about Stew. And that happened after he quit the Pirates beat.
 
You can make up whatever bs you need. Ollie admitted the atory was bogus and then paid Bill 1.7 million dollars to speak no more of it.

Casazza was never going to say a bad word about Luck. Did you notice who got the scoop from Oliver? It was no coincidence.

Olliie admitted no such thing. WVU and Stew BOTH signed an agreement to never talk about it. That means neither party addressed the particulars of his dismissal.

Your memory is selective and self-serving.

I loved Stew. But I have no idea why an exit would be named after him.
 
Dunlap was NOT fired. He remained with the Post-Gazette and became the PG's new beat writer for the Pirates. He became a new father and then decided that he did want to spend all of the time on the road necessary to cover a major league baseball team and then sought other opportunities that allowed him to stay home.

Here's the kicker: I am not absolutely certain ..... but I think Dunlap got the Pirates gig BEFORE the thing with Stew went down. As a matter of fact, I am becoming more certain, it was on Dunlap's radio talk show, or a show that he was filling in on, that he made the revelation about Stew. And that happened after he quit the Pirates beat.
Your memory is pretty bad.
 
Olliie admitted no such thing. WVU and Stew BOTH signed an agreement to never talk about it. That means neither party addressed the particulars of his dismissal.

Your memory is selective and self-serving.

I loved Stew. But I have no idea why an exit would be named after him.
Ollie announced he was investigating the claims made by Dunlap and at the completion of the investigation he would decide what to do. He later stated that he could not confirm the claim and Stew was paid off shortly thereafter.
 
Here ... read this.
Early this morning on 93.7 The Fan, former Pittsburgh Post-Gazette writer Colin Dunlap accused Bill Stewart of calling and asking him to "dig up this dirt" on Dana Holgorsen.

If he was "former" of the Post Gazette Gazette that means he had already left. It happened just like I said it happened.

Now do your own research: LINK TO THE TRUTH ABOUT COLIN DUNLAP AND STEW
 
Dunlap said ....

If you want to go look at my cell phone records you can, I don’t need to hide from it. The conversation happened the day he (Stewart) was driving to the airport from the high school coaches convention in Pittsburgh. He was on his way to Orlando. (WVU assistant coach) Dave McMichael was in the car with him. The conversation happened.

Stew never even denied having the conversation.

Any public figure who is falsely accused responds by saying something like: " I said no such thing and I have no further comment at the time."

Stew NEVER said anything. And then WVU agreed with Stew to not talk about it if he took the money and left.
THAT is what happened.

I loved the guy. But he screwed up royally at the end.
 
NDA's are common when settlements are reached, especially between employer and employee. It's existence means nothing.

Dunlap had already left his position when he when he made his claims about Stewart.

So now Dave says that both Dunlap AND Casazza were lying? Quite the Conspiracy.
 
You can make up whatever bs you need. Ollie admitted the atory was bogus and then paid Bill 1.7 million dollars to speak no more of it.

Casazza was never going to say a bad word about Luck. Did you notice who got the scoop from Oliver? It was no coincidence.

It's true. Casazza backed up Dunlap.
 
NDA's are common when settlements are reached, especially between employer and employee. It's existence means nothing.

Dunlap had already left his position when he when he made his claims about Stewart.

So now Dave says that both Dunlap AND Casazza were lying? Quite the Conspiracy.

He has the facts AND the time table completely wrong and he accuses me of having a bad memory.

Dave ..... you're the gullible one here.

Stew was a lovable guy. But he screwed up BIG TIME at the end.

But Ollie should have never put him in the position that he was in. If Ollie said anything afterwards, he only obliquely addressed that the HCIW thing should have never happened.
 
NDA's are common when settlements are reached, especially between employer and employee. It's existence means nothing.

Dunlap had already left his position when he when he made his claims about Stewart.

So now Dave says that both Dunlap AND Casazza were lying? Quite the Conspiracy.

I'm sorry ..... but it does mean something when 1) Someone significant is publicly accused and they never deny and then 2) they sign the NDA.

It means that Stew NEVER denied Dunlap's claim and thenchose to put himself in a position of never being able to do so.
All reasonable people know what happened.
 
I'm sorry ..... but it does mean something when 1) Someone significant is publicly accused and they never deny and then 2) they sign the NDA.

It means that Stew NEVER denied Dunlap's claim and thenchose to put himself in a position of never being able to do so.
All reasonable people know what happened.

Sure. Dave claims the NDA is proof that the story is false. Which is ridiculous.

If Dunlap were lying, not only would I deny his claims, I'd probably sue him as well. The conspiracy theory being spun by Dave is totally unnecessary, and he cant even get his timeline straight.

Dunlap left his position BEFORE he went public about Stew.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT