ADVERTISEMENT

Big 12 winning percentage of recent Big 12 coaches

dolemitebmf

All-American
May 29, 2001
16,335
342
223
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie
 
It looks like #1 was the correct answer. ThePunish-EER loves hiding from the facts. I do expect to see some personal attacks, lies, and excuses, though, if the hypocrite shows his face after being put in his place, yet again...
 
Still waiting for ThePunish-EER...

Tail-Betweeb-Legs-300x297.jpg
 
Last edited:
Did your mom cut off the internet again, ThePunish-EER? Maybe that is a sign you need to move out of her basement...

Tail-Betweeb-Legs-300x297.jpg
 
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie

Are these numbers against ALL competition or just against Big12 teams? How many years?
 
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie

Still waiting for our cowardly resident Marshall troll, ThePunish-EER to weigh in on this...

Tail-Betweeb-Legs-300x297.jpg
 
Not this loser again! What's up geek? How was your Christmas? Hopefully you got that Big Wheel you were hoping to get.
 
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie

Statistics, depending on how you present them... can say different things. This list doesn't qualify anything other than how the OP wants them to. What if we looked at first year HQ's who just entered a new, tougher conference with a depleted roster? What if we took a look at first year ever HQ's who were new to their position? What if we just looked at a team that needed to step up to a vastly superior league? See where I'm going. The numbers would shift and change, I think.

Sorry.. HQ = Head Coach
 
Statistics, depending on how you present them... can say different things. This list doesn't qualify anything other than how the OP wants them to. What if we looked at first year HQ's who just entered a new, tougher conference with a depleted roster? What if we took a look at first year ever HQ's who were new to their position? What if we just looked at a team that needed to step up to a vastly superior league? See where I'm going. The numbers would shift and change, I think.



Do really think you're smarter than everyone else or are you just smug and arogant?
 
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie

Still waiting for our cowardly resident Marshall troll, ThePunish-EER to weigh in on this...

Tail-Betweeb-Legs-300x297.jpg
you nitwit lol. Your attempted point only makes sense if the coaches above Dana were fired lol. Coaches below him mean they weren't as good and their firing means nothing when compared to Dana. About as stupid as saying, "what happened to the sec coaches below Saban with a losing record?", in some distorted way of saying Saban sucked. You're an idiot mouth breather lol
 
you nitwit lol. Your attempted point only makes sense if the coaches above Dana were fired lol. Coaches below him mean they weren't as good and their firing means nothing when compared to Dana. About as stupid as saying, "what happened to the sec coaches below Saban with a losing record?", in some distorted way of saying Saban sucked. You're an idiot mouth breather lol
You really are the most idiotic, most hypocritical poster in the history of this board. Your messiah is the third worst coach remaining in the Big 12. What a bargain, hypocrite...

Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%
 
You really are the most idiotic, most hypocritical poster in the history of this board. Your messiah is the third worst coach remaining in the Big 12. What a bargain, hypocrite...

Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%
you nitwit lol. Your attempted point only makes sense if the coaches above Dana were fired lol. Coaches below him mean they weren't as good and their firing means nothing when compared to Dana. About as stupid as saying, "what happened to the sec coaches below Saban with a losing record?", in some distorted way of saying Saban sucked. You're an idiot mouth breather lol
 
All coaches and their staffs are pretty much created equal. It's just that somebody has to lose when a game is played. The winning team u$ually is the one that has been in the winner$ circle for a long time. Still, there ain't nothing guaranteed. Only when teams like Texas and Nebraska stumble can you make room for a team like Clem(p)son to squeeze in. So, there remains hope that maybe one day the Mountaineers will get their turn in the circle. We playing a bowl game in a day or so. I'm happy with that!
 
you nitwit lol. Your attempted point only makes sense if the coaches above Dana were fired lol. Coaches below him mean they weren't as good and their firing means nothing when compared to Dana. About as stupid as saying, "what happened to the sec coaches below Saban with a losing record?", in some distorted way of saying Saban sucked. You're an idiot mouth breather lol
You really are the most idiotic, most hypocritical poster in the history of this board. Your messiah is the third worst coach remaining in the Big 12. What a bargain, hypocrite...

Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%

Maybe one day, if you ever move out of your mom's basement, you will understand what the phrase one of the worst means. Dana is 8 out of 10. There are only two worse coaches than Dana remaining. You are clearly a part of the participation trophy generation...
 
Coach Big 12 Winning %
Bob Stoops 79.43%
Mack Brown 74.81%
Mike Gundy 60.22%
Bill Snyder 59.26%
Gary Patterson 58.33%
Art Briles 56.52%
Charlie Strong 50.00%
Dana Holgorsen 41.67%
Kliff Kingsbury 37.04%
Paul Rhoads 26.23%
Charlie Weis 5.26%
David Beaty 0.00%


What will ThePunish-EER's first reaction be:
1) Hide
2) Make a personal attack
3) Make an excuse
4) Lie

Not trying to stick up for DH, but all of the guys ahead are paid a higher salary.

You get what you pay for.
 
Not trying to stick up for DH, but all of the guys ahead are paid a higher salary.

You get what you pay for.
Snyder makes a little less. Patterson is close.

Todd Graham, Rich Rodriguez, Paul Johnson, Frank Beamer, Paul Chryst, Tommy Tuberville, Pat Narduzzi, Ken Niumatalolo, Tom Herman, and Frank Solich all made less than Holgorsen, and are much better coaches...
 
you nitwit lol. Your attempted point only makes sense if the coaches above Dana were fired lol. Coaches below him mean they weren't as good and their firing means nothing when compared to Dana. About as stupid as saying, "what happened to the sec coaches below Saban with a losing record?", in some distorted way of saying Saban sucked. You're an idiot mouth breather lol
Could someone please translate this gibberish.
 
Could someone please translate this gibberish.
It translates loosely to: I cannot make any valid arguments or point to any proof. This gets me so angry and frustrated that I will simply act like a hypocrite, calling people childish names and trying to shut down any discussion...
 
You're weird geek!

Yet another impressive post. ......and is referring to a person as a geek really still considered an insult ?

I'm sure you'll attempt a witty reply that will actually be funny....mostly for unintended reasons.
 
Yet another impressive post. ......and is referring to a person as a geek really still considered an insult ?

I'm sure you'll attempt a witty reply that will actually be funny....mostly for unintended reasons.


That wasn't an insult. Oh no not another board policeman. Geez it's the Captain of the geek patrol himself. Low fat why do you hang out on the Pitt board then come over hear in your spare time?
 
Board police(wo)man...captain of the geek patrol...Pitt board.....


...like I wrote earlier, you'd ATTEMPT to be witty.
 
Board police(wo)man...captain of the geek patrol...Pitt board.....


...like I wrote earlier, you'd ATTEMPT to be witty.


So you're a girl? My apologies if I offended you sweetheart! I wasn't trying to be funny. I was serious.
 
So you're a girl? My apologies if I offended you sweetheart! I wasn't trying to be funny. I was serious.

Why don't you take your little punk ass condescending, pejorative and misogynist comments back to your PlayStation and let the adults speak here? You have nothing to add.
 
That wasn't an insult. Oh no not another board policeman. Geez it's the Captain of the geek patrol himself. Low fat why do you hang out on the Pitt board then come over hear in your spare time?


You consistently show your ignorance. "Hear" should be "here"! What a dumb f^&K for a self-described 29 year old. I wouldn't hire you to sweep my floors, much less work in the mail room. You'd get it all wrong!
 
  • Like
Reactions: countryroads89
You consistently show your ignorance. "Hear" should be "here"! What a dumb f^&K for a self-described 29 year old. I wouldn't hire you to sweep my floors, much less work in the mail room. You'd get it all wrong!


You'll never be in the position to hire me! I'm living the dream pal. I have a mail room and I have hired guys like you. It's good being dumb.
 
Why don't you take your little punk ass condescending, pejorative and misogynist comments back to your PlayStation and let the adults speak here? You have nothing to add.


You have anger management issues honey. I highly recommend you seek help. The men in your life must have really hurt you. No need for an emotional breakdown. I'll give it a break. Your post has so much pain in it. You do realize this is an athletic website right? You turn every thread into a war.
 
You have anger management issues honey. I highly recommend you seek help. The men in your life must have really hurt you. No need for an emotional breakdown. I'll give it a break. Your post has so much pain in it. You do realize this is an athletic website right? You turn every thread into a war.

"arogant" and "hear" in one thread, lol, and you pretended you went to WVU. LOL! [laughing]
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT