Bergdahl charged with desertion and aiding the enemy

[WVPATX]

And we gave up five terrorists to secure his release. Obama celebrated this deal at the White House.

 

[orlando eer]

Probably 0's prototype of a perfect American soldier. Hard to see any other

reason to free hardened terrorists for a deserter.

This post was edited on 3/25 5:54 PM by orlando eer

 

[orlando eer]

Hopefully no one loses their career over proscecuting 0's boy.

I guess 0 will pardon him anyway. His kind of guy.


This post was edited on 3/25 9:02 PM by orlando eer

 

[Popeer]

Re: Bergdahl was NOT charged with aiding the enemy

He was charged with desertion and misbehaving before the enemy. Big difference. He'll still spend time in Leavenworth.

 

[KTeer]

Re: Hopefully no one loses their career over proscecuting 0's boy.

Six GI's lost their lives looking for him.

 

[WVPATX]

Re: Bergdahl was NOT charged with aiding the enemy

Misbehaving means some form of collaboration. If not, he wouldn't be misbehaving. I see your still supporting Obama's ridiculous swap even after U.S. soldiers were killed looking for this deserter.

 

[Popeer]

Re: Bergdahl was NOT charged with aiding the enemy

Originally posted by WVPATX:
Misbehaving means some form of collaboration. If not, he wouldn't be misbehaving. I see your still supporting Obama's ridiculous swap even after U.S. soldiers were killed looking for this deserter.

No, misbehavior does not equal collaboration. Learn the difference. And nowhere in my statement did I make any value judgement about the swap.




http://usmilitary.about.com/library/milinfo/mcm/bl

 

[WVPATX]

Re: Bergdahl was NOT charged with aiding the enemy

Semantics. Do you support Obama's swap?

 

[Motown Mounty]

Actually.....

"misbehaving before the enemy" cab be close to the same as aiding and abetting. In this case it pretty much means he did something in front of the enemy that makes the US look weak.