Bad enough UK pays their players. Paying the officials too. *
- Thread starter Soaring Eagle 74
- Start date
The refs set the tone with bad calls by giving our best big man two fouls in the first two minutes.
Kentucky has superior talent but the refs weren 't going to let aggressive players beat Kentucky,
The refs got bad for both teams. They always do in big blow outs.
The make up calls to keep the game closer and to say they had even amount of calls on both teams.
Bullshit part of badketball .,,
Kentucky has superior talent but the refs weren 't going to let aggressive players beat Kentucky,
The refs got bad for both teams. They always do in big blow outs.
The make up calls to keep the game closer and to say they had even amount of calls on both teams.
Bullshit part of badketball .,,
WVU didn't lose due to officiating.
With that said, UK always has the officiating if things do get close. They had a player tonight foul out tonight. Probably the first time in over a decade, they had someone foul out.
With that said, UK always has the officiating if things do get close. They had a player tonight foul out tonight. Probably the first time in over a decade, they had someone foul out.
No surprise.....
In blow outs the the refs make Lots offer up calls to prove they are fair .
Kentucky is the better team...,
Refs took any rare chance away early...,
Kentucky wins 8 out of 10 on talent
In blow outs the the refs make Lots offer up calls to prove they are fair .
Kentucky is the better team...,
Refs took any rare chance away early...,
Kentucky wins 8 out of 10 on talent
You're right! UK got lucky.. If not for those 2 bad calls in the 2nd half I saw WVU pulling out the win.
You know, I just don't understand the logic of people claiming UK pays their players. UK recruits many players that end up choosing other schools such as Kansas, Duke, UNC, etc. They would need to have already been made an offer of money during the recruitment, correct? Why then, when the player goes to a rival school and championships are on the line have they NEVER, NOT ONCE turned UK in???? Wouldn't a player, a family member, parent, someone rat out UK one time ???? Have they? Then how does this system work smart guys????
when you lose by almost 40 you cant blame the refs for anything I salute Kentucky and their historical win tonight they hopefully humbled someone who ran his mouth and got a big fat goose egg for his stats tonight
I still wonder why the announcers and refs felt they need to " keep WVU under control".
We are an aggressive pressing team. We aren't in fights.... We don't take flagrant fouls....
The fouls are slapping types trying to strip or steal the ball.
It's weird .....they act like we play Detroit piston type of dirty basketball. We don't have any no lay up rules for hard fouls.
It's weird the reaction from the refs and sportscasters
We are an aggressive pressing team. We aren't in fights.... We don't take flagrant fouls....
The fouls are slapping types trying to strip or steal the ball.
It's weird .....they act like we play Detroit piston type of dirty basketball. We don't have any no lay up rules for hard fouls.
It's weird the reaction from the refs and sportscasters
I don't have any goods on UK but your logic is faulty. Just because you have not been caught does not mean you are not cheating. USC did it for years before they were caught and the truth is most crimes go unsolved. Nor would a player on the take rat himself out to get at a team he turned down. The fact that they get so many of the good players suggest someone is doing something extra to get them there and paying is one possibility.
Kentucky Doesn't Pay...................the NBA pays. Read on*
Seriously..............I don't think Kentucky pays their players. I think Kentucky has adapted the ..............give us one or two years and you then jump to the NBA where you will be making the big bucks. Players know that Kentucky makes this offer to only the top players and takes nothing but the best. They also know that Kentucky is good with them playing on the collegiate level for only one (or two) years and then moving on to the NBA. All teams should adapt this philosophy but..................there ain't enough top tier players to go around and Kentucky thought of it first! Dadgummit! Duke tries it's hand at this philosophy but.......................plays second fiddle. In the real world......................there is something wrong with how the sports world operates. SHOW ME THE JACK!
Seriously..............I don't think Kentucky pays their players. I think Kentucky has adapted the ..............give us one or two years and you then jump to the NBA where you will be making the big bucks. Players know that Kentucky makes this offer to only the top players and takes nothing but the best. They also know that Kentucky is good with them playing on the collegiate level for only one (or two) years and then moving on to the NBA. All teams should adapt this philosophy but..................there ain't enough top tier players to go around and Kentucky thought of it first! Dadgummit! Duke tries it's hand at this philosophy but.......................plays second fiddle. In the real world......................there is something wrong with how the sports world operates. SHOW ME THE JACK!
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Five Thoughts: WVU 86 #3 Gonzaga 78 (OT). The arrival of the Doberman.- Latest: bobhertzel'ssweatpants
-
-
-
