More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
This might be news to you but, did you know that at one time glaciers covered a lot of the world surface?More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
Who was burning the fossil fuels 20,000+ years ago, to cause the climate change, to melt the glaciers?This might be news to you but, did you know that at one time glaciers covered a lot of the world surface?
Why use cherry picked data?More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
The Pope and Rachel have me worked up? Lol, no, but the right is all over it!
You do realize that the stats are from 1994-2003. Might want to check which party was governing the White House during this "debacle."
BTW, I don't favor either party so just pointing out an observation.
More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/
Same? Better? Worse?More research for the wingnuts to ignore....
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...now-losing-75-billion-tons-of-ice-every-year/