ADVERTISEMENT

Why more U.S. colleges will go under in the next few years

WVU82

Hall of Famer
May 29, 2001
179,642
52,309
718
http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/care...ill-go-under-in-the-next-few-years/ar-AA9ZDtl

When officials at Sweet Briar College announced earlier this month that the Virginia women's’ school would close at the end of this year, the news drew the attention of countless national media outlets and panicked alumnae looking for ways to save the school.

After all, how often does a “rich girl’s school,” as one student described Sweet Briar in the New York Times, just suddenly shut down?

It’s pretty rare for a more than 100-year-old school with a national reputation for a beautiful campus, close-knit community and accessible professors to just up and close. In the 10 years leading up to 2013, five nonprofit colleges and universities closed a year on average, according to a study from higher education researchers at Vanderbilt University. But the trend is likely to accelerate in the coming years, as colleges cope with lower tuition revenue due in part to lackluster enrollment, student worries about employment prospects and being saddled with debt after graduation.

“We expect that there will be more college closures over the next three to four years,” Susan Fitzgerald, a senior vice president at Moody’s. “I don’t think it’s going to be a landslide of college closures, but we are coming through a very tough period of time.”

About one-third of all colleges and universities in the U.S. are on an unsustainable financial path, according to a 2012 report from consulting firm Bain & Co. While some of the schools on that list have resources, like a large endowment and a steady enrollment base, that could help them stave off closure, smaller, private colleges “need to be on the lookout,” Jeff Denneen, the leader of Bain’s higher education practice and one of the authors of the report, said in an interview.

“They have many fewer degrees of freedom and a much shorter runway to get things in order and I think that’s a little bit of what you saw at Sweet Briar,” he said.

Declining enrollments fueled by relatively flat high school graduation rates and increased competition from online competitors are squeezing private schools with fewer than 5,000 students, particularly those that draw on their local region in areas like the rural northeast and some of the Midwest, Fizgerald said. But one of the biggest challenges facing this group of schools is the crisis in college affordability.

About 40 million Americans are already saddled with student loan debt and the heightened attention on the issue has made prospective college students wary of taking on more.

“In the post-Great Recession era, there’s more and more focus on the return on investment on what one gets from an education,” said Jason Lane, a senior fellow at SUNY’s Rockefeller Institute of Government. The concern from students and families is so great that the Obama administration is developing a ratings system to help students better understand the relative value of their degree.

During this fiscal year, public and private universities in the U.S. are expected to experience the slowest net tuition revenue growth in more than a decade, according to Moody’s U.S. higher education outlook. That’s in part because they’ve had to expand tuition discounts to draw in more students. For small, private schools that rely heavily on tuition revenue, that sort of arrangement can be hard to keep up for a long period of time.

“That’s why these colleges then end up in these really financial stressed situations,” said Fitzgerald. Indeed, Sweet Briar’s interim president, James F. Jones Jr., called an uptick in the school’s aid dollars as a share of tuition and fees — known as the tuition discount rate -- “financially unsustainable” in a statement announcing the school’s closing.

A group of the school’s faculty and alumnae is trying to stop the school from shutting down, in part by alleging that Sweet Briar officials violated state law when they solicited donations, even as they were planning to close the school.

To be sure, Sweet Briar’s financial woes may be specific to the school. While changing demographics and the recession are challenging schools of all kinds, many private, liberal arts schools are doing just fine, according to David Warren, the president of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, an group representing more than 1,000 nonprofit private schools.

“Just because they’re small, just because they have the modest faculty or just because they’re rural, that doesn’t mean that closings are in sight,” he said.

Many of these types of schools have innovated successfully to adapt to changing demands by finding a specific niche such as health sciences or art and design, reaching out to non-traditional college populations, or including some kind of online learning in the mix.

“For a lot of these smaller private liberal arts institutions that were largely dependent on tuition and serving students that were fairly college ready, there’s a lot more competition for that demographic and it’s shrinking pretty significantly,” said Lane.
 
You may not see a lot of smaller colleges close, but you may see athletic departments closing.

The P5 is absolutely destroying the rest in terms of revenue, and boosters aren't going to be lining up (and neither are fans) to watch their teams compete for nothing.

No college will face bankruptcy to save their athletic department. They will cut and run.

Imagine what will happen if and when the P5 decide to increase their scholly limit to 95 or 100. That's 65 teams with 10 extra scholarships. (I'll give snooping fans from Marshall and Georgia Southern time to grab a calculator. ...............................................................................)

That's 650 extra scholarships if the limit is only raised by 10. On the bright side, that is 650 more kids receiving a quality education. But where are these kids coming from? The answer is from the bottom 5 schools. Obviously, these bottom 5 feast on talented kids that could not make meet the academic standards of a P5 school. However, they are comprised mostly of kids who had to go to these schools because there was no room for their scholarship. If the change is made, kids who were on the fence of getting a scholarship offer from a P5 school will now probably get that offer because roster space will permit.

What does this mean for bottom 5 schools? Imagine if you will, the best 650 kids on scholarship in the bottom 5. Now take those 650 kids and spread them out among the P5 schools in any way you want..... it doesn't matter. Just give each P5 school and extra 10 kids. What are you left with in the bottom 5? The answer is absolute depression. They are having trouble getting people to pay to attend their games as it is. Imagine what will happen when they have to go even deeper into the "what the P5 left us barrel". They also will have major trouble competing with any P5 school. Attendance, media rights, and competition will drop even further. It will be only a matter of time before the colleges on the brink of bankruptcy start dropping athletic departments.

This is one of many ways that the bottom 5 schools are in a lot of trouble.
 
You may not see a lot of smaller colleges close, but you may see athletic departments closing.

The P5 is absolutely destroying the rest in terms of revenue, and boosters aren't going to be lining up (and neither are fans) to watch their teams compete for nothing.

No college will face bankruptcy to save their athletic department. They will cut and run.

Imagine what will happen if and when the P5 decide to increase their scholly limit to 95 or 100. That's 65 teams with 10 extra scholarships. (I'll give snooping fans from Marshall and Georgia Southern time to grab a calculator. ...............................................................................)

That's 650 extra scholarships if the limit is only raised by 10. On the bright side, that is 650 more kids receiving a quality education. But where are these kids coming from? The answer is from the bottom 5 schools. Obviously, these bottom 5 feast on talented kids that could not make meet the academic standards of a P5 school. However, they are comprised mostly of kids who had to go to these schools because there was no room for their scholarship. If the change is made, kids who were on the fence of getting a scholarship offer from a P5 school will now probably get that offer because roster space will permit.

What does this mean for bottom 5 schools? Imagine if you will, the best 650 kids on scholarship in the bottom 5. Now take those 650 kids and spread them out among the P5 schools in any way you want..... it doesn't matter. Just give each P5 school and extra 10 kids. What are you left with in the bottom 5? The answer is absolute depression. They are having trouble getting people to pay to attend their games as it is. Imagine what will happen when they have to go even deeper into the "what the P5 left us barrel". They also will have major trouble competing with any P5 school. Attendance, media rights, and competition will drop even further. It will be only a matter of time before the colleges on the brink of bankruptcy start dropping athletic departments.

This is one of many ways that the bottom 5 schools are in a lot of trouble.

I don't think there is any logical way Marshall can continue to operate a Division 1 athletic program after the next couple of years. Let's face it, that school exists on welfare payments from the state for the most part. Just about every building built there, any project at all, has extensive infusions of state funding. Those funds are drying up.

Their athletic program is losing $15.1 million per year at last count. And, all of their programs are filled with non qualifiers that couldn't meet Power 5 academic requirements. But I don't see how the Power 5 schools will take those extra 600+ athletes. Schools like Marshall have "remedial" programs where they can take an illiterate "student" with athletic ability and essentially start him out in 3rd. grade and work him up through an athletic coaching assistant or general studies degree, that is a degree in name only. Power 5 schools lack those programs... they have never needed them.

I simply can't imagine West Virginia taking on 10 of Marshall's semi cretonic criminal athletes in Morgantown. They are safe in that regard. Where they will lose it all is by continually overextending themselves with losses financially. Eventually, they will have to pay the piper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wvumtk
I don't think there is any logical way Marshall can continue to operate a Division 1 athletic program after the next couple of years. Let's face it, that school exists on welfare payments from the state for the most part. Just about every building built there, any project at all, has extensive infusions of state funding. Those funds are drying up.

Their athletic program is losing $15.1 million per year at last count. And, all of their programs are filled with non qualifiers that couldn't meet Power 5 academic requirements. But I don't see how the Power 5 schools will take those extra 600+ athletes. Schools like Marshall have "remedial" programs where they can take an illiterate "student" with athletic ability and essentially start him out in 3rd. grade and work him up through an athletic coaching assistant or general studies degree, that is a degree in name only. Power 5 schools lack those programs... they have never needed them.

I simply can't imagine West Virginia taking on 10 of Marshall's semi cretonic criminal athletes in Morgantown. They are safe in that regard. Where they will lose it all is by continually overextending themselves with losses financially. Eventually, they will have to pay the piper.

You have to understand that the majority of bottom 5 players are not non qualifiers. They are simply guys who got the job done academically, but did not receive a P5 athletic scholarship due to the 25 per year or 85 total limit. These kids would simply just provide more depth to P5 schools. Now for the props, I would assume that they would stay at the bottom 5. Any kid who can't make the grades to initially attend a P5 school, I would encourage to go to a junior college, get good grades, ,and attempt a P5 school in a couple years. Look at Lackawanna CC. WVU just put two of their transfers in the NFL. Granted, they weren't academic casualties, but the process was still the same. They did two years at JC, transferred to a P5 school, they now have 4 year NFL contracts with a top notch degree to fall back on. The same goes for Jacob McCrary. He had a 4 year Marshall scholarship offer waiting for him after he couldn't make the academic requirements. What did he do? He said he was going the JC route, and would try to come to WVU in a couple years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CT Mountaineer
You have to understand that the majority of bottom 5 players are not non qualifiers. They are simply guys who got the job done academically, but did not receive a P5 athletic scholarship due to the 25 per year or 85 total limit. These kids would simply just provide more depth to P5 schools. Now for the props, I would assume that they would stay at the bottom 5. Any kid who can't make the grades to initially attend a P5 school, I would encourage to go to a junior college, get good grades, ,and attempt a P5 school in a couple years. Look at Lackawanna CC. WVU just put two of their transfers in the NFL. Granted, they weren't academic casualties, but the process was still the same. They did two years at JC, transferred to a P5 school, they now have 4 year NFL contracts with a top notch degree to fall back on. The same goes for Jacob McCrary. He had a 4 year Marshall scholarship offer waiting for him after he couldn't make the academic requirements. What did he do? He said he was going the JC route, and would try to come to WVU in a couple years.
Good points. I agree that a JC route would be much better than taking the remedial program at a Marshall and being stuck in Huntington for 4 or 5 years. A young man has a chance to get a real degree in the end, and to play for a top notch program too.

Many people are under the misconception that entry into WVU and a school like Marshall are the same due to both being state supported schools. That is simply not true. While both schools will take a 2.0 gpa in state student, the course requirements for admittance are markedly different with WVU having far more stringent requirements in terms of math and language courses.

There will actually be very few high school graduates applying to WVU, having taken the advanced math and language courses required, that will actually have a 2.0 average. The kids who haven't taken the advanced courses, and have a 2.0 can go to Marshall. I would assume athletes would have to meet similar standards.
 
http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/

rank ....school ....conf ....total revenue ....total expenses ....total subsidy ....% subsidy

35 West Virginia ..... Big 12 .....$77,626,819 .....$76,618,251 .....$4,441,522 .....5.72

88 Marshall ..... CUSA .............$28,707,091 .....$29,441,144 .....$14,056,395 .....48.96

129 Georgia Southern Southern .....$18,929,350 .....$18,109,721 .....$13,550,186 .....71.58

lol... 50% ... wow

... WV taxpayers & Moo students own half of Moo sports... what a waste of time & money...

http://sports.usatoday.com/ncaa/finances/
 
Last edited:
Of course, some of the mentioned lackluster enrollment has to do with much fewer high school seniors being prepared for college. In a few generations, we've gone to teaching Latin in high school to remedial English in college.
 
Of course, some of the mentioned lackluster enrollment has to do with much fewer high school seniors being prepared for college. In a few generations, we've gone to teaching Latin in high school to remedial English in college.
Not only that, the political correctness idiots have actually made knowing English (obviously necessary for success in this country) not necessary and requiring proficiency in it somehow discriminatory. I had a boss once who graduated from Columbia University, and she actually couldn't string a set of words together without misspelling a couple of them. Her first language was Ebonics, and she was encouraged to use that in school it would seem.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT